Mediation and Conciliation, what are they?
Under article 1 mentioned above, the term "mediation" shall mean the activity, however named, conducted by an impartial third party and aimed to assist two or more entities, both in finding an amicable agreement for the composition proceedings, both in the formulation of a proposal for the resolution of the dispute.
In practice, we can say is that the mediation process which leads, or should, that the settlement of a dispute to conciliation between the parties. For
" conciliazione “ , il Legislatore ha intenso riferirsi alla composizione di una controversia a seguito dello svolgimento della medizione.
Il mediatore.
Il “ mediatore “ è la persona o le persone fisiche che, individualmente o collegialmente, svolgono la mediazione rimanendo prive, in ogni caso, del potere di rendere giudizi o decisioni vincolanti per i destinatari del servizio stesso di mediazione.
L’ organismo d conciliazione.
“ L’organismo” è rappresentato da un ente pubblico o privato presso il quale ci si può rivolgere ai fini della mediazione.
Il registro.
Si intende il “ registro ” degli organismi di conciliaizione così come meglio disciplinato dal decreto ministeriale n.180 del 2010 che stabilisce i criteri e le modalità di iscrizione e tenuta del medesimo registro.
Soggetti della mediazione.
In base all’art.2 del decreto legislativo n.28 del 2010, chiunque può accedere alla mediazione.
Oggetto della mediazione.
La mediazione ha oggetto la conciliazione di una controversia civile e commerciale vertente esclusivamente su diritti disponibili, nel rispetto di quanto previsto dal decreto legislativo n.28 del 2010 il quale, comunque, non preclude le negoziazioni volontarie e paritetiche relating to civil and commercial disputes or complaints procedures laid down in the card services.
framework of mediation.
the mediation process, Regulation of the body chosen by the parties.
This regulation must always ensure: a) the confidentiality of the same procedures as best article 9 of Legislative Decree concerned, b) the manner of appointment of the Ombudsman to ensure their impartiality and the capacity to proper and prompt completion of the assignment.
Under paragraph three of Article 3 of the decree, the mediation may take place in a manner telematiche previste dal regolamento dell’organismo di conciliazione.
Forma del procedimento di mediazione.
Ai sensi del comma secondo dell’art.3 del decreto 28/2010 gli atti del procedimento di mediazione non sono soggetti ad alcuna particolare formalità.
Modalità della domanda di mediazione.
La domanda di mediazione si presenta mediante il deposito di una istanza presso un organismo.
In caso di più domande relative alla medesima controversia, la mediazione si svolge davanti all’organismo presso il quale è stata presentata la prima domanda.
Per determinare il tempo della domanda si ha riguardo alla data di ricezione della comunicazione.
Contenuti minimi della domanda di mediazione.
La domanda di mediazione deve contenere: a) denominazione dell’organismo; b) dati anagrafici delle parti; c) oggetto della domanda; d) ragioni della pretesa.
Doveri di informazione da parte del difensore.
All’atto del conferimento dell’incarico, l’avvocato è tenuto a informare il cliente della possibilità di avvalersi del procedimento di mediazione e delle relative agevolazioni fiscali di cui agli articoli 17 e 20 del decreto n.28/2010.
L’avvocato, altresì, informa il proprio assistito – clearly and in writing - in situations where the experiment is a condition of admissibility of the mediation proceedings.
In case of violation of disclosure requirements described above, the contract between the lawyer el'assistito is voidable.
The document containing the information is before witnessing the undersigned and shall be attached to the application of any legal proceedings.
the court to assess the allegation of failure to document, if any action under Article 5 paragraph 1 of the decree, inform the party of the right to request mediation.
The condition of admissibility.
According to paragraph 1 of Article 5 of Decree n.28/2010, who wishes to practice in a court action relating to a dispute that followed, he must preliminarmenente eseperire to the mediation process which is precisely condition admissibility of the proceedings.
Let us consider the matters relating to the dispute in question: building, division, inheritance, family agreements, lease, loan, rental companies, compensation for damage resulting from movement of vehicles and boats and the medical liability and defamation through the press or other means of advertising, banking and financial insurance contracts.
Rapporti con il processo ordinario.
In sede processuale, l’improcedibilità della domanda deve essere eccepita dal convenuto, a pena di decadenza, o rilevata d’ufficio dal giudice, non oltre la prima udienza.
Il giudice, dove rilevi che la mediazione è già iniziata, ma non si è conclusa, fissa la successiva udienza dopo la scadenza di cui all’art.6 del decreto.
Detta udienza è fissata dal giudice anche nel caso in cui la mediazione non sia stata esperita, assegnando contestualmente alle parti il termine di quindici giorni per la presentazione della domanda di mediazione.
Quanto appena descritto non si applica alle azioni degli articoli 37, 140 and 140bis of the Consumer Code referred to in Legislative Decree 6 September 2005, n.206, as amended.
Mediation and urgent measures and protective measures.
during the mediation in any case does not preclude the granting of interim measures and protective measures, nor the transcript of the proceedings.
The first and second paragraphs of Article 5 of the decree does not apply in the following procedures: a) proceedings for an order, including the opposition, pending a decision on applications for granting and withdrawal of provisional execution, b) proceedings for validation license or eviction, up to the change of procedure in Article cpc .667;
c) proceedings owners, pending delivery of the measures under Article .703, third paragraph, cpc;
d) opposition proceedings or incidental knowledge of the enforcement; e) proceedings in closed session;
f) in the civil action pursued in the criminal trial.
The mediation clause.
Subject to the provisions of subsection except as provided by the first and third and fourth paragraphs of Article 5 of Decree n.28/2010, if the contract, the statute or the act of incorporation provide for a mediation clause or conciliation and the attempt is not exhausted, the judge or the referee, Except for the part, given pretty good first defense, shall allow the parties a period of fifteen giurni for the submission of the application for mediation and set the next hearing after the expiration of four months.
Similarly, the judge or the referee fixed the next hearing if mediation or conciliation are started but not completed. The application is made before the body specified by the clause, if entered in the register, or, failing that, before another body in writing, without compliance with the criteria set out in article 4, first paragraph. In any case, the parties may agree seccessivamente to the contract or the statute or the statute, the identification writing a different body.
effects of the application for mediation prescription or limitation.
Since the communication to the other parties, the request for mediation has on the effects of the prescription claim.
from the same date, the application for mediation prevents also the loss only once, but if the attempt fails, the proceedings must be instituted within the same period of decline following the date of filing of the report referred to in art. 11 at the secretariat of the body.
Duration of mediation and working suspension.
mediaizone The procedure lasts no more than a quattro mesi.
Tale termine decorre dalla data di deposito della domanda di mediazione, ovvero dalla scadenza di quello fissato dal giudice per il deposito della stessa e, anche nei casi in cui il giudice dispone il rinvio della causa ai sensi del quarto o del quinto periodo del comma primo dell’art.5, non è soggetto a sospensione feriale.
Effetti sulla ragionevole durata del processo.
Il periodo di cui all’art.6 ed il periodo del rinvio disposto dal giudice ai sensi dell’art.5, comma primo, non si computano ai fini di cui all’art.2 della legge 2001 n.89 relativa alla previsione di equa riparazione in caso di violazione del termne ragionevole del processo.
mediation process: the first meeting between the parties.
At the time of application for mediation, the mediator and designate a person in charge of fixing the first meeting between the parties within fifteen days from the filing date.
The application and the date of the first meeting shall be communicated to the other party by any appropriate means to ensure the reception, including by the requesting party.
The auxiliary mediator and expert consultants.
In disputes that require specific technical skills, the body may appoint one or more auxiliary mediators. When
can not proceed to under the first paragraph, last sentence, the Ombudsman may make use of experts registered in the registers of consultants in the courts.
The Rules of Procedure of the body must include the methods of calculation and payment of fees of the experts.
form of the mediation process.
The mediation process is carried out without any formality at the head office of mediation or at the place specified in the Rules of Procedure of the organism.
Any mutual agreement.
The mediator shall ensure that the parties reach an amicable agreement for adjudication.
Non-participation in the proceeding.
from non-participation without good reason the mediation proceedings, the court may infer test subjects in subsequent proceedings under Article .116, second paragraph, cpc
's obligation of confidentiality.
Whoever lends his work or his service in the body or any part of the proceedings is obliged to respect the confidentiality of statements made and information acquired during the proceedings.
Confidentiality in separate sessions.
Compared to the statements made and information acquired during separate sessions and unless consent of the registrant or from whom the information, the Ombudsman is also required to maintain confidentiality vis-à-vis the other parties.
usability of the statements and information.
The statements made or information obtained in the course of the mediation process can not be used in the trial on the same subject, even partial, which began, summary or continued after the failure of mediation, unless consent of the registrant or from which they come information.
the content of those statements and information shall not be allowed oral testimony e non può essere deferito giuramento decisorio.
Segreto professionale e garanzie di libertà del mediatore.
Il mediatore non può essere tenuto a deporre sul contenuto delle dichiarazioni rese e delle informazioni acquisite nel procedimento di mediazione, né davanti all’autorità giudiziaria né davanti ad altra autorità.
Al mediatore si applicano le disposizioni dell’art.200 c.p.p. E si estendono le garanzie previste per il difensore ex art. 103 c.p.p. In quanto applicabili.
Processo verbale dell’accordo amichevole.
Se è raggiunto un accordo amichevole, il mediatore forma processo verbale al quale is attached the text of the Agreement.
Formulation of the proposal.
When the agreement is not reached, the mediator may propose a settlement.
In any case, the Ombudsman makes a proposal for settlement if the parties make him joint request at any time during the proceedings.
Before the formulation of the proposed settlement, the mediator shall inform the parties of the possible consequences under Article 13 of the Ordinance.
Communication, form and content of the proposal.
The proposed settlement is communicated to the parties in writing.
The parties submitted to the mediator, in writing and within seven days, the acceptance or rejection of the proposal. Failure to respond within the time limit, the proposal has to be refused.
Unless the parties otherwise agree, the proposal does not contain any reference to statements made or information obtained in the course of the proceedings.
Minutes of conciliation.
If amicable settlement is reached in the first paragraph of Article 11 of the Ordinance, or if all parties accept the mediator's proposal, the minutes should be signed by the parties and the mediator, who certify the signatures of the parties or their inability to sign.
transcript conciliation.
If the agreement with the parties conclude a contract or perform any of the actions foreseen by .2643 cc, to proceed with the signing of the transcript of that record must be authenticated by a public officer authorized to do.
violation, failure or delay in the settlement of obligations.
This agreement, even after the proposal may provide for the payment of a sum of money for each violation or failure to comply with obligations or for the delay in their implementation.
not be reconciled
If conciliation fails, the mediator Minutes form with details of the proposal and the signature of the parties and the mediator which certifies the signatures of the parties or their inability to sign.
In the same report, the broker acknowledges the lack of participation of either party to the mediation process.
Deposit of minutes.
The minutes relating to arbitration or the failure to conciliaizone must be filed with the secretary of the body and it is provided with a copy to the parties that need it.
approval.
The verbal agreement, whose contents are not contrary to public policy or mandatory rules, it is tested, on application and subject to formal investigation also, by decree of the president of the court in whose district has its headquarters' body.
border disputes.
border disputes referred to in article 2 of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 May 2008, the minutes were approved by the presiding judge in the district where the agreement must be enforced.
Enforcement.
Il verbale di accordo costituisce titolo esecutivo per l’espropriazione forzata, per l’esecuzione in forma specifica e per l’iscrizione di ipoteca giudiziale.
Contenuto della proposta identico al provvedimento del giudice.
Ai sensi del comma primo dell’art.13 del decreto n.28 del 2010, quando il provvedimento che definisce il giudizio corrisponde interamente al contenuto della proposta, il giudice esclude la ripetizione delle spese sostenute dalla parte vincitrice che ha rifiutato la proposta, riferibili al periodo successivo alla formulazione della stessa, e la condanna al rimborso delle spese sostenute dalla parte soccombente relative allo stesso periodo, nonché al versamento into the national budget an additional amount equal to the sum of contributions due to unified.
remains, however, the possibility of applying the provisions of Articles 92 CPC (costs to be awarded for individual acts. Compensation of expenses) and Code of Civil Procedure 96 (Liability worse.).
The above also applies to the costs of compensation paid to the Ombudsman, and the remuneration payable to the expert referred to in article 8, paragraph four.
content of the proposal is not identical to the judge's ruling.
Under the second paragraph of Article 13 of Decree No. 28 of 2010, when the measure that defines the opinion does not correspond entirely to the contents of the proposal, the judge, if there are serious and exceptional reasons, it may nevertheless eclsudere the recovery of costs incurred by the successful party to the compensation paid to the Ombudsman, and the remuneration payable to the expert referred to in Article .8 fourth paragraph.
Motivation of court order as to costs.
The court must state explicitly in the grounds, the reasons for the decision on costs.
Non-applicability of Article 13 to arbitration.
Unless otherwise agreed by the provisions of Article 13 of the decree does not apply proceedings before the arbitrators.
treated Affairs and fees.
the broker and its agents are forbidden to take any rights or obligations related, directly or indirectly with the business transacted, except those closely related to the performance of the work or service.
the Ombudsman and his agents are prohibited from receiving compensation directly from the parties.
Declaration of impartiality.
The Ombudsman must sign for each business for which appointed, a statement of impartiality according to the formulas provided for in the Rules of Procedure applicable nonché gli ulteriori impegni eventualmente previsti dal medesimo regolamento.
Informazione delle ragioni di possibile pregiudizio.
Il mediatore ha l’obbligo di informare immediatamente l’organismo e le parti delle ragioni di possibile pregiudizio all’imparzialità nello svolgimento della mediazione.
Limiti dell’ordine pubblico e delle norme imperative.
Il mediatore ha l’obbligo di formulare le proposte di conciliazione nel rispetto del limite dell’ordine pubblico e delle norme imperative.
Richieste del responsabile dell’organismo.
Il mediatore ha l’obbligo to respond immediately to any request from the official of the organization.
Replacing the mediator.
Under the third paragraph of Article 14 of the decree, on application, the responsible body shall ensure the eventual substitution of the mediator.
The regulation identifies the different jurisdiction to decide on requests for replacement when the mediation was conducted by the responsible organism.
public and private institutions.
public or private, that provide guarantees of reliability and efficiency, organizations are entitled to be members, at the request of the interested party, to manage the mediation process in matters referred to in Article 2 of the decree.
The register of conciliation bodies.
organizations must be registered.
The formation of the Registry and its review, registration, suspension and cancellation of membership, the establishment of separate sections of the register for the discussion of matters which require specific expertise in consumer and international, as well as the determining the entitlements of bodies are governed by special decree of the Minister of Justice, in concert with regard to the matter of consumption, with the Minister of Economic Development.
Until such decrees shall apply, mutatis mutandis, the provisions of the decrees of the Minister of Justice 23 July 2004 and July 23, 2004 n.222 n.223.
conform to these provisions, until the same date, the bodies of-court settlement under art. 141 of the Consumer Code, referred to in Legislative Decree 6 September 2005, n.206, as amended. Source: (The security - author of the post. Mr. Walter Marchetti)
For more info see also Sun 24 0re .
0 comments:
Post a Comment